Cyber Crime case against X handle that posted CM Revanth’s Z+ schedule and blood group

A Hyderabad Cyber Crime police station case has put a social-media handle at the centre of a Chief Minister’s security leak. On 4 September 2026 the public record locked that administrators of the X account styled ‘Telugu Scribe’ face investigation for posting confidential Z+ security details of Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy’s Delhi visit.

The complaint that started the trail was filed by Chief Security Officer K.B. Franklin. It says a June 13 wireless message — addressed to the Delhi Police Joint Commissioner, the Telangana Bhavan Resident Commissioner, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport authorities and the Director General of Police — carried a minute-by-minute schedule of the visit, Z+ protective measures, the Chief Minister’s blood group, and the CSO’s phone number. Those particulars, the complaint alleges, were exposed on the account while the visit was still underway. That combination — schedule, protection tier, medical identifier, and the officer’s contact — is why the desk treats this as an Investigate lead and not a routine social-media quarrel.

The same complaint was first registered at Khairatabad police station on 14 July. It was later transferred to the Cyber Crime police station on orders of the City Additional Commissioner (Crimes). The transfer matters: what began as a local station FIR is now a cyber investigation into how protected wireless traffic about a sitting Chief Minister’s movement reached a public timeline.

Investigation is underway. The account’s bio presents the handle as citizen journalism. This cutting does not invent the identities of every administrator, the full text of every post, or a concluded charge sheet. Those are not locked. What is locked is the CSO’s complaint, the June 13 wireless contents as described in that complaint, the July Khairatabad registration, the transfer to Cyber Crime, and the 4 September framing of a live cyber case against the handle’s administrators.

Z+ security is meant to keep a VIP’s movements off open channels. When a wireless meant for police, airport and state-house recipients surfaces on a public account with blood group and CSO phone attached, the breach is not only reputational. It is operational. Readers should hold the complaint narrative and the Cyber Crime case as the established set, and treat any claim about motive, leak source inside the wireless chain, or guilt of named persons as unproven until a court or a finished charge sheet says otherwise.

Telangana’s capital already lives with VIP convoy politics. This edition’s Investigate card is narrower: a documented wireless, a transferred FIR, and a Cyber Crime case that asks how CM security traffic left the protected list and landed on X.