Praja Hakku

PRAJA HAKKU

The Journalism of Outrage

Investigate

ED arrests two on a Goa ‘Secret Supervision’ trail; ₹30,000 crore and ₹27,850 crore stay two books, unmerged.

ED arrests two on a Goa ‘Secret Supervision’ trail; ₹30,000 crore and ₹27,850 crore stay two books, unmerged.

The Enforcement Directorate arrested Fahim Moin Hussain Sayed and Naim Mueen Sayyed on Sunday, 23 August 2026, under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The file is a money-laundering probe linked to a digital-arrest cyber-fraud that originated in Goa. Arrests are agency steps. They are not a conviction.

Place of arrest and production conflicts across public accounts. One public account says the two were taken from Mumbai and produced before a special Prevention of Money Laundering Act court in Mumbai, which granted transit remand to Panaji, where the case is registered. Another public account, citing the agency, places the 23 August arrest and production in Goa. This desk records both geographies and will not pick one.

The predicate is a first information report registered on 9 June 2025 at the Cyber Crime Police Station, North Goa — first information report number 17/2025 on one public account. A Goa resident was coerced through a digital-arrest scam into transferring money between 21 May and 2 June 2025 into accounts falsely described as Secret Supervision Accounts. One public account puts that transfer at about ₹2.60 crore. Another public account puts it at ₹2,60,33,634. Those are two writings of the same predicate transfer. This desk will not round one into the other.

On the agency statement, proceeds were converted first into cash and then into foreign currency using companies holding Reserve Bank of India licences as Full Fledged Money Changers. Victim funds were routed within hours through dormant or new accounts and fragmented across more than 400 beneficiary accounts. Companies were incorporated in the names of persons of modest means, including drivers and residents of single-room tenements shown as directors, while control of the accounts remained with others. Those are agency allegations. They are not findings of a trial court.

Two money books sit on this file and this desk will keep both. One public account describes a network involving transactions worth ₹30,000 crore, suspects’ bank transactions worth ₹27,000 crore and cash dealings of ₹3,000 crore, about 300 victim complaints and 150–160 first information reports across 20 States and Union Territories, and reported fraud with victims estimated around ₹4,000 crore. The agency statement, separately, says interconnected commodity-trading, travel and forex entities conducted banking transactions exceeding ₹27,850 crore and deposited about ₹2,904 crore in cash, including ₹584.70 crore through 61,448 Bulk Note Acceptance Machine transactions; accounts under scanner in 330 victim complaints and 163 first information reports across 20 States and Union Territories; aggregate reported loss ₹417.49 crore; and in 101 complaints, one victim’s funds went into two or more entities in the same network. ₹30,000 crore and around ₹4,000 crore stay on the public-account line. ₹27,850 crore and ₹417.49 crore stay on the agency-statement line. This desk will not merge them into a single invented total.

Searches covered 20 premises in Mumbai and Goa on 17 July 2026, and further premises on 21 August. Cash seized is about ₹3.25 crore, plus digital devices, records and statutory registers.

One public account said the agency was expected to produce the two before a special court in Panaji on Monday, 24 August, seeking custodial interrogation. The outcome of that production is not confirmed on this tip. This desk will not invent a remand order.

Mumbai and Panaji are the two geographies in conflict. North Goa’s cyber-crime police station holds the predicate first information report. Form B and any poll date are not notified on this file. Until a court writes, the public ledger is a Sunday Prevention of Money Laundering Act arrest of two named persons, a Goa digital-arrest predicate, a Secret Supervision Account coercion between 21 May and 2 June 2025, two unmerged writings of the predicate transfer, two unmerged money books — ₹30,000 crore transactions with an around-₹4,000 crore victim-fraud estimate on one public account, and ₹27,850 crore banking with ₹417.49 crore reported loss on the agency statement — cash seized of about ₹3.25 crore, and a Monday production whose result this page does not have. Every rupee and every charge remains allegation.